{"id":5122,"date":"2018-06-07T02:00:16","date_gmt":"2018-06-07T09:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/softwareengineeringdaily.com\/?p=5122"},"modified":"2021-11-01T05:15:54","modified_gmt":"2021-11-01T12:15:54","slug":"future-of-computing-with-john-hennessy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/softwareengineeringdaily.com\/2018\/06\/07\/future-of-computing-with-john-hennessy\/","title":{"rendered":"Future of Computing with John Hennessy"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Moore\u2019s Law states that the number of transistors in a dense integrated circuit double about every two years. Moore\u2019s Law is less like a \u201claw\u201d and more like an observation or a prediction.<\/span><\/p>\n

Moore\u2019s Law is ending. We can no longer fit an increasing amount of transistors in the same amount of space with a highly predictable rate. Dennard scaling is also coming to an end. Dennard scaling is the observation that as transistors get smaller, the power density stays constant.<\/span><\/p>\n

These changes in hardware trends have downstream effects for software engineers. Most importantly–power consumption becomes much more important. <\/span><\/p>\n

As a software engineer, how does power consumption affect you? It means that inefficient software will either run more slowly or cost more money relative to our expectations in the past. Whereas software engineers writing code 15 years ago could comfortably project that their code would get significantly cheaper to run over time due to hardware advances, the story is more complicated today.<\/span><\/p>\n

Why is Moore\u2019s Law ending? And what kinds of predictable advances in technology can we still expect?<\/span><\/p>\n

John Hennessy is the chairman of Alphabet. In 2017, he won a Turing award (along with David Patterson) for his work on the RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Compiler) architecture. From 2000 to 2016, he was the president of Stanford University.<\/span><\/p>\n

John joins the show to explore the future of computing. While we may not have the predictable benefits of Moore\u2019s Law and Dennard scaling, we now have machine learning. It is hard to plot the advances of machine learning on any one chart (as we explored <\/span>in a recent episode with OpenAI<\/span><\/a>). But we can say empirically that machine learning is working quite well in production.<\/span><\/p>\n

If machine learning offers us such strong advances in computing, how can we change our hardware design process to make machine learning more efficient?<\/span><\/p>\n

As machine learning training workloads eat up more resources in a data center, engineers are developing domain specific chips which are optimized for those machine learning workloads. The Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) from Google is one such example. John mentioned that chips could become even more specialized within the domain of machine learning. You could imagine a chip that is specifically designed for an LSTM machine learning model.<\/span><\/p>\n

There are other domains where we could see specialized chips–drones, self-driving cars, wearable computers. In this episode, John describes his perspective on the future of computing and offers some framework for how engineers can adapt to that future.<\/span><\/p>\n

Show Notes<\/h2>\n